Home Book editor Irritated, irritated and annoyed: first letters to the editor

Irritated, irritated and annoyed: first letters to the editor

4
0

Indeed, the book seems completely inappropriate to be put in the hands of young people or to have a place on the table of the family library.

TRW
new York

October 9, 1932

Editor-in-Chief, The New York Times Book Review:

If one is to believe Mr. Hemingway, the great adventure and the thirst for blood merge in the Castilian arenas. One might wonder how a bullfight differs from a dogfight, or a main weaponry, or burrows in a rat pit, or shooting pigeons from a trap, except, indeed, that a corrida endangers human life. I have never seen the cover of any of the more than 2,000 Spanish books and pamphlets on this topic, and after reading the tearful tosh distilled by Mr. Hemingway, I didn’t feel like doing it.

AE HOWARD
New York City

August 3, 1952

For the publisher:

I was directed by questionable friends to the recent review of my novel, “Forty-Four Gravel Street”. I was particularly intrigued by the reviewer’s mention of a “bald woman chained to a bed”. This episode, while charming, is not in the book; and I fear that the reckless reader, perhaps not as imaginative as a seasoned critic, will be disappointed.

BEN MADDOW
Los Angeles

ANSWER

For the publisher:

I was wrong. The lady was not chained to a bed (and it turns out later that she has hair). Here’s the phrase that threw me – “and across the hall, peering through an eighth of an inch of an open door, the emaciated Mrs. Post, secured behind a chain and a special bar -.” I misinterpreted it as “kept secure by a chain and a special bar.”

REX LARDNER
new York

May 17, 1959

For the publisher:

I just called my attention to a letter from a gentleman by the name of Spencer Brown that appeared in your journal.

This gentleman seems, for some reason, to be annoyed with me.

I am understandably desperate, for it is evident that no small literary reputation I can possess could survive the disapproval of such a distinguished and famous literary critic.

By the way, who is he?

I am intrigued by his name. Not by Brown – a most respectable name. But why, for God’s sake, Spencer? Can he be a relative of our English Earl Lord Spencer? I think not. Or MM. Marks and Spencer? May be. He is right to speak of himself as “ordinary”. That it certainly is, in the true sense of the word.


Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here